Labels

awards (31) battle (7) books (4) event (40) FAB (39) fashion (135) gaga (5) lol (2) magazine cover (7) Malaysia boleh (1) monthly (6) movie premiere (23) movies (4) music (11) myself (4) random (6) red carpet (38) streetswear (3) UGH (39) video (9) weekly (5)

Sunday, 10 July 2011

Fashion: Kelly Rowland in Versace

Who cares about all those Cheryl "Oh I felt so betrayed becuz I got ditched from this show because the Americans can't understand my accent enough to even like me so I'm going to betray myself now by getting this new ugly do and go back to Ashley" Cole drama? We're not even talking about her now. We're talking about miss Kelly here who replace Cheryl's spot and went on exploring America for hidden singing talent because American Idol and The Voice and America's Got Talent and Ellen Degeneres and Usher, oh, no, not Usher coz Bieber is a Canadian. Err.. Yeah. Because all that is just not enough to dig up all those hidden talent in America.

But who cares? Again. We're talking about clothes here. Sheesshh...

Kelly Rowland at one of the X-Factor audition in London.

Versace Spring 2011


Well, firstly, it's way better than this "I'm tryin to look all cute and stuff while still flaunting my abs" getups.

Secondly, it fits her perfectly well. I never knew she had got a quite amazing body.

Thirdly, that print is godawful ugly on a dress. If it was made a wallpaper, though, it will be a cool and funky one. Or maybe a couch or something.

Fourthly, as much as I hate mid-baring two-piece dress (there's gotta be a name for that right?), I think this is acceptable. Not that offensive or eye-soring or slutty. This is actually quite chic, thanks to the length of it and its funky (but still ugly, on a dress) print. Plus that's not too much abs she's baring there.

Killer body + perfect fit + tolerable mid-baring + just-right hem length + ugly prints = Nah. I'll go with okay.

What do you think? About my math?

No comments:

Post a Comment