But who cares? Again. We're talking about clothes here. Sheesshh...
Kelly Rowland at one of the X-Factor audition in London. |
Versace Spring 2011 |
Well, firstly, it's way better than this "I'm tryin to look all cute and stuff while still flaunting my abs" getups.
Secondly, it fits her perfectly well. I never knew she had got a quite amazing body.
Thirdly, that print is godawful ugly on a dress. If it was made a wallpaper, though, it will be a cool and funky one. Or maybe a couch or something.
Fourthly, as much as I hate mid-baring two-piece dress (there's gotta be a name for that right?), I think this is acceptable. Not that offensive or eye-soring or slutty. This is actually quite chic, thanks to the length of it and its funky (but still ugly, on a dress) print. Plus that's not too much abs she's baring there.
Killer body + perfect fit + tolerable mid-baring + just-right hem length + ugly prints = Nah. I'll go with okay.
What do you think? About my math?
No comments:
Post a Comment